USA Banner

Official US Government Icon

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Site Icon

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation United States Department of Transportation

Site Notification

Site Notification

Central Texas Turnpike System

Central Texas Turnpike
Alternate Project Name
Project Type
Roads and Bridges
Financing Type
Credit Agreement Executed
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)
Project Description

When the TIFIA loan closed, the Central Texas Turnpike System (CTTS) consisted of three contiguous toll highways serving the Austin metropolitan region and the Austin-San Antonio corridor:

  • SH 45 North - 13 miles, four to six lanes, from Ridgeline Boulevard west of U.S. 183 eastward to SH 130
  • Loop 1 - a northward extension of the existing Loop 1 (Mopac Expressway), three miles from Parmer Lane to SH 45 North
  • SH 130 (Segments 1-4) - a 49-mile, four-lane tollway extending north-south through Williamson and Travis Counties, extending from I-35 north of Georgetown to U.S. 183 southeast of Austin

SH 130 (Segments 1-4) was procured through Texas' first application of its Exclusive Development Agreement (later Comprehensive Development Agreement) provision, contractual arrangements equivalent to public-private partnerships. In this case, a design-build contract was used to accelerate completion.

SH 130 is 91 miles in total length extending further south and west to I-10. Segments 5 and 6 were constructed under a separate DBFOM (design, build, finance, operate, and maintain) procurement. In August 2012, State Highway 45 Southeast (SH 45 SE) was added to CTTS. Service commenced on November 11, 2012.

Project Details
TIFIA Assistance
Primary Revenue Pledge
User Charges
Project Cost
Fiscal Year Closed
All project elements opened between November 2006 and April 2008.
Funding Sources
First Tier Revenue Bonds: $1.358B
TIFIA Loan: $900M (used to retired Bond Anticipation Notes [BANs] in 2007 and 2008)
State Funding: $520.1M
Local Contributions / Commission Funds for ROW: $286.5M
Interest Earnings: $185.2M
Project Delivery/Contract Method
SH 45 North and Loop 1 used Design-Bid-Build; SH 130 (Segments 1-4) was Design-Build.
Project Participants
Lone Star Infrastructure (joint venture of Fluor Corporation, Balfour Beatty Construction and T.J. Lambrecht Co) - SH 130 (Segments 1-4)
Project Advisers/Consultants
HDR - Program management


Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. - Traffic & Revenue

McCall, Parkhurst & Horton, LLP - Bond counsel

RBC Capital Markets Corp. - Financial advisor

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust - Trustee


TIFIA Legal Advisor: Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP
TIFIA Financial Advisor: Montague DeRose and Associates, LLC/TransTech Management, Inc.
Project Lender
Bondholders, USDOT TIFIA
Credit Assistance Detail
Direct loan: up to $917M; TxDOT only requested $900M. The DOT had a subordinate lien on gross revenues (i.e., prior to operations and maintenance costs) and the trust estate.
Financial Status
The TIFIA credit agreement was signed on July 25, 2002. Of the approximately $2.2B in capital market debt, $900M was issued as low interest BANs maturing in 2007 and 2008. In June 2007, TxDOT used its first draw of TIFIA loan proceeds in the amount of $124.930M to retire the 2007 BANs, and subsequently retired $775.07M in 2008 BANs with a second draw of TIFIA loan proceeds in June 2008. TIFIA interest payments began in February 2010. On February 15, 2015, the Texas Transportation Commission repaid its $900M TIFIA loan. The project’s strong performance facilitated a refinancing to pay off the TIFIA loan 27 years ahead of schedule.
Use of innovative financing and a fixed-price, lump-sum design-build contract for SH 130 delivered the CTTS components 25 years sooner than conventional pay-as-you-go financing would have delivered.
Components were delivered ahead of schedule and less than the original 2002 cost estimate.
Application Details
Texas Department of Transportation
LOI Fiscal Year Received
Application Received Fiscal Year
Estimated Project Cost
TIFIA Request
Instrument Type
Direct Loan