Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA)
Each applicant to the INFRA grants program should provide a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) for their proposed project. BCA is a systematic process for identifying, quantifying, and comparing expected benefits and costs of a potential investment. The information provided in the applicants’ BCAs will be evaluated by USDOT, and will be used to help ensure that the available funding under the program is devoted to projects that provide significant economic benefits to users and the Nation as a whole, relative to the resources required to implement those projects.
In preparing a BCA, applicants should consult the “Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for TIGER and INFRA Applications” document. This guide contains key information on procedures for conducting benefit-cost analysis, standard monetization values for many benefits, and other useful guidance for preparing a BCA for submission as part of the application. Applicants who need additional help after reading this guidance (and the reference materials cited therein) should contact USDOT staff, who are available to answer questions and offer technical assistance up to the final application deadline.
To the extent that an application for the same project submitted to the INFRA grants program contains few or no changes to a benefit-cost analysis or project readiness information, USDOT may review and incorporate the previously completed analysis by Department staff into the application's evaluation when considering the project.
As applicants develop their applications, there are some guidelines on project readiness that they should consider. By statute, INFRA funds must be obligated within three years of the end of the fiscal year for which they are authorized. Obligation occurs when a selected applicant enters a written, project-specific agreement with the Department and is generally after the applicant has satisfied applicable administrative requirements, including transportation planning and NEPA requirements. Because of this deadline for obligation, it is important that the application package include sufficient evidence of project milestones (including planning, NEPA, and permitting milestones) achieved and remaining, as well as financial capacity and commitment in order to support project readiness.
Applicants should be aware that each operating administration with the responsibility for obligating the INFRA Grant funds has its own regulations, policies, and procedures that may apply to projects selected. In some cases, an operating administration may obligate a portion of the overall award amount for the purpose of completing eligible pre-construction activities, delaying the balance of the obligation of funds until all pre-construction requirements have been completed. Generally, DOT may not obligate for construction until all planning and environmental approvals are obtained and right-of-way acquisitions and final design are complete. If a project is selected for a INFRA Grant and the Grant funding will be used to complete all of these activities, DOT may obligate the funding in phases, in accordance with the laws, regulations, and policies of the operating administration that is administering the grant.
The guidelines below provide additional detail on some pre-construction activities that are required prior to the total award being obligated (including, but not limited to, planning requirements, environmental approvals, right-of-way acquisitions, and design completion). Suggestions for milestones each project should target in order to obligate the full amount of awarded INFRA Grant funds, in advance of the obligation deadline are also provided. Applicants should demonstrate that they can reasonably expect to complete all of these activities and pre-construction so that all Grant funds are obligated in advance of the statutory deadline. The applicant should be able to demonstrate that any unexpected delays will not put INFRA Grant funds at risk of expiring before they can be fully obligated. With regard to the permitting approach, the applicant should provide adequate information for DOT to assess whether the remaining environmental review and permitting milestones can be achieved through this approach in order for obligation within the statutory timeframe. Applicants that are unfamiliar with, or have questions about, the requirements that a proposed project or projects may need to complete in order for the operating administration to obligate Grant funds may contact INFRAGrants@dot.gov with questions. The below information is not an exhaustive list, but rather an overview of the requirements that may need to be completed Grant funds can be obligated by the operating administration that is administering the Grant.
State and Local Planning
A project that receives Grant funds may require approval by the Metropolitan Planning Organization or State as part of the Long Range Plans and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)/Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Applicants should coordinate with the relevant planning authority to ensure that the project will be included in the appropriate plan if required before an operating administration may obligate funds to the project. If the project is not included in the relevant planning documents when the INFRA application is submitted, applicants should include with their application a certification from the appropriate planning agency that actions are underway to include the project in the relevant planning document. If the obligation of INFRA Grant funds for construction or other activities is contingent on the project being included in the relevant planning documents, applicants should include a schedule in their application demonstrating they reasonably expect to have the project included in such planning documents by the statutory deadline.
Projects should have received all Federal, State and local permits and approvals, including completion of all National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) analysis, at the time the application is submitted. It would be important to include information relevant to projects being considered for the new permitting approach; the application should include adequate information to assess the ability to achieve remaining environmental reviews and permitting in a time period that would allow funds to be obligated within the required timeframe. If any part of the environmental review or permitting process is incomplete at the time of application, the applicant should demonstrate, through their project schedule, narrative and supporting documents, that they will complete NEPA and obtain any other necessary permits and approvals, as well as complete all additional, necessary pre-construction steps by the statutory obligation date and, if appropriate, how the applicant distinguishes the permitting approach as appropriate to achieve this result.
If the obligation of Grant funds for construction or other activities is contingent on completion of other approvals that can only take place after the environmental approvals process, the applicant should demonstrate, through their project schedule, narrative, and supporting documents, that they can reasonably expect to obtain all environmental approvals by the statutory date. Like planning, environmental approvals must be obtained prior to completing other pre-construction project elements.
To demonstrate that this suggested milestone is achievable, the applicant should supply sufficient documentation for DOT to adequately review the project’s environmental approval status. Applicants should provide information about the anticipated type of NEPA review; the budget for completing NEPA, including hiring a consultant if necessary; and a schedule that demonstrates when NEPA will be complete. The schedule should show how the suggested milestones described in this section will be achieved, and include any ongoing or anticipated coordination with Federal and State resource and/or regulatory agencies for permits and approvals. Additionally, it should include target dates for all NEPA and permitting milestones including interim steps (i.e. Permit application) necessary to receive any required review or permit.
The budget should demonstrate how costs to complete the required environmental approvals factor into the overall cost to complete the project. The budget and schedule for completing the environmental approvals should be reasonable and be comparable to a budget and schedule of a typical project of the same type. Additionally, the applicant should provide any environmental studies or other documents (preferably by way of a website link) that describe in detail known project impacts and possible mitigation for these impacts.
Right-of-Way and Design
The obligation of INFRA Grant funds for construction or other activities by an operating administration may be contingent on completion of right-of-way acquisition and final design approval, and/or additional approvals contingent on completion of right-of-way acquisition and design. Therefore, applicants should demonstrate, through their project schedule that they reasonably expect to have right-of-way acquisition and design completed, as well as any other needed approvals or pre-construction steps. Applicants should submit a reasonable schedule of when right-of-way (if applicable), design, and any other required approvals are expected to be obtained. Applicants may expect that DOT may obligate funds for right-of-way acquisition and design completion only after planning and environmental approvals are obtained.
To maximize the value of FY 2021 INFRA funds for all Americans, the Department is seeking applications which leverage federal funding to attract non-federal sources of infrastructure investment. This objective aligns with the Department’s Infrastructure Strategic Objective #1: Project Delivery, Planning, Environment, Funding, and Finance.
To evaluate this criterion, the Department will assign a rating to each project based on how the calculated non-Federal share of the project’s future eligible project costs compares with other projects proposed for INFRA funding. The Department will sort large and small project applications’ non-Federal leverage percentage from high to low, and the assigned ratings will be based on quintile: projects in the 80th percentile and above receive the highest rating; the 60th -79th percentile receive the second highest rating; 40th - 59th, the third highest; 20th - 39th, the fourth highest; and 0-19th, the lowest rating.
To help applicants gauge competitiveness of proposed non-Federal contributions, the Department has published information about the non-Federal leverage proposed in applications from the Fiscal Year 2020 INFRA round below.
Note: the non-federal leverage ranges below are representative of the 2020 pool of applications. An applicant’s 2021 Leveraging of Federal Funding rating will depend on how it ranks among 2021 applications.
INFRA Large Projects FY2020
|Ranking||Non-Federal Leverage Range|
|5th Quintile (80th - Above)||69% - 94%|
|4th Quintile (60th - 79th)||55% - 68%|
|3rd Quintile (40th - 59th)||42% - 54%|
|2nd Quintile (20th - 39th)||21% - 41%|
|1st Quintile (0 - 19th)||6% - 20%|
INFRA Small Projects FY2020
|Percentile Ranking||Non-Federal Leverage Range|
|5th Quintile (80th - Above)||51% - 86%|
|4th Quintile (60th - 79th)||41% - 50%|
|3rd Quintile (40th - 59th)||40% - 40%|
|2nd Quintile (20th - 39th)||21% - 39%|
|>1st Quintile (0 - 19th)||0% - 20%|